Boards Uneasy About ‘The Survivor Question’

Agenda – A Financial Times Service Article written by Amanda Gerut in Collaboration with MyLogIQ

Nominating and corporate governance committees are grappling with how to make board evaluations more meaningful, and one niggling question that has emerged is whether boards should ask individual directors to rank the contributions of peers.

Data from SEC compliance and public company intelligence provider MyLogIQ shows that Arconic’s corporate governance guidelines state that “board positions should not be regarded as permanent. Directors should serve only so long as they add value to the board, and a director’s ability to continue to contribute to the board should be considered each time the director is considered for re-nomination.”

To view the full article click here. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *